This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Pinging patches
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:55:11 -0800
- Subject: Re: Pinging patches
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5654C1BB dot 4070501 at redhat dot com> <CAMe9rOpu7XEanVZednAtod820QP7Qk0o30KzwAxqeKOTETLDtA at mail dot gmail dot com> <5654CC79 dot 4000705 at redhat dot com>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/24/2015 01:29 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Just a note to folks, we're well into stage3 in our development cycle
>>> right
>>> now. Richi, Bernd, Jason, myself and others are working through our
>>> queues
>>> of patches that were submitted before the deadline.
>>>
>>> If you are not currently iterating with a maintainer on a patch that was
>>> submitted before the close of stage1, please ping the patch, including a
>>> link to the patch in the archives.
>>>
>>>
>>> It's important we wrap up the loose ends and move our focus to bugfixing.
>>> Speaking strictly for myself, the bar for what I'll consider will be
>>> rising
>>> daily from now until the release.
>>
>>
>> FYI, I am planning to ping this patch
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02791.html
>>
>> to fix an ABI wrong code and this patch:
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02605.html
>>
>> which is a prerequisite for x86 interrupt attribute patch submitted
>> weeks ago.
>
> I believe hte interrupt patches really need to wait for the next stage1.
> jeff
>
X86 interrupt attribute was first submitted in September and it
is limited to x86 backend, except for
TARGET_FUNCTION_INCOMING_ARG_RTL
which is no-op for other backends. We really like to enable it
in GCC 6.
--
H.J.