This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] c/67882 - improve -Warray-bounds for invalid offsetof

From: Martin Sebor <msebor at gmail dot com>
To: Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt at redhat dot com>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 12:14:54 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c/67882 - improve -Warray-bounds for invalid offsetof
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <56172C8C dot 2070202 at gmail dot com> <5620ED47 dot 2090009 at redhat dot com> <56215158 dot 5040404 at gmail dot com> <56263F80 dot 1090203 at t-online dot de> <56265E51 dot 4070009 at gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1510201650350 dot 7944 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <5626A5A0 dot 7040003 at redhat dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1510202200590 dot 9787 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <562A164A dot 2030002 at redhat dot com> <562A4EF2 dot 8080901 at gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1510231650090 dot 20997 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <562A7230 dot 6060103 at redhat dot com> <562A9B49 dot 7090600 at gmail dot com>

I guess this is a case where I could say either "I wrote the patch" or
"I requested changes to a patch in review"; in the latter case I can
approve it. Joseph seems on board with what we've discussed, so I'd say
please wait until Tuesday for objections then commit.


I didn't get to committing the patch last week but I have done so
just now.

Martin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]