This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 09/29/2015 09:04 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 09/29/2015 09:43 AM, Jeff Law wrote:FWIW, I tried to build a simple cc0 target with LRA (v850-elf), but it fell over pretty early. Essentially LRA doesn't seem to be cc0-aware in split_reg as ultimately inserted something between a cc0-setter and cc0-user. Oops.Yes, that is true. When I started to work on LRA, I decided to ignore cc0 first. But since then, no progress was made on this front.
No worries.
I wouldn't suggest making cc0 support a significant priority. I'd be more likely to push for deprecating cc0 targets first.I guess the support of cc0 can be implemented for reasonable amount of time. It is just a priority issue. I still have a lot PRs for the targets already using LRA.
jeff
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |