This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Use hardware support for vector character multiply


On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 13:29 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Richard Biener
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Bill Schmidt
> > <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 23:26 +0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Bill Schmidt
> >>> <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > It was pointed out to me recently that multiplying two vector chars is
> >>> > performed using scalarization, even though we have hardware support for
> >>> > byte multiplies in vectors.  This patch adds an expansion for mulv16qi3
> >>> > to correct this.
> >>> >
> >>> > The expansion is pretty simple.  We do a multiply-even and multiply-odd
> >>> > to create halfword results, and then use a permute to extract the
> >>> > low-order bytes of each result.  This particular form of a permute uses
> >>> > a different set of input/output vector modes than have been used before,
> >>> > so I added the altivec_vperm_v8hiv16qi insn to represent this.  (The two
> >>> > source operands are vector halfword types, while the target operand is a
> >>> > vector char type.)
> >>>
> >>> This seems like something which should be done in vector generic
> >>> rather than the back-end.  I am not blocking this patch but just
> >>> suggesting an alternative way of doing this instead of a target
> >>> specific patch.
> >>
> >> Currently vector-generic checks whether the back end implements the
> >> smul_optab for the specific vector type; if not, it scalarizes the code.
> >> I'm not sure what else it should do.  Targets might implement the
> >> character multiply in several different ways (directly, using
> >> mult-even/mult-odd, using mult-hi/mult-lo), so anything other than
> >> leaving the multiply in place could be wrong for some targets.  Am I
> >> misunderstanding your point?
> >
> > I think Andrews point is the vectorizer could try different ways to vectorize
> > the char multiply if the target does not support it directly, like effectively
> > doing what you are now doing in the target.
> >
> > That's certainly possible but IMHO will be a bit awkward with the current
> > vectorizer structure.  So as a medium-term solution I prefer Bills.
> 
> 
> Yes that is correct.  That is why I said I am not blocking this patch
> for a generic fix but I just want to make sure the long-term solution
> is the generic solution.

Ok, I see.  So the vectorizer could try various known patterns for the
multiply and see if the target supports them instead, thus exposing
multiply-even/odd or what-have-you to more optimization.  That's
reasonable.  Thanks for the explanations!

Bill

> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew
> 
> >
> > Richard.
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> Bill
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Andrew
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> > I've added two test variants, one to test the code generation, and one
> >>> > executable test to check correctness.  One other test failed with this
> >>> > change.  This turned out to be because PowerPC was excluded from the
> >>> > check_effective_target_vect_char_mult target support test.  I resolved
> >>> > this by adding check_effective_target_powerpc_altivec to that test.
> >>> >
> >>> > Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with no
> >>> > regressions.  Is this ok for trunk?
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> > Bill
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > [gcc]
> >>> >
> >>> > 2015-09-03  Bill Schmidt  <wschmidt@vnet.linux.ibm.com>
> >>> >
> >>> >         * config/rs6000/altivec.md (altivec_vperm_v8hiv16qi): New
> >>> >         define_insn.
> >>> >         (mulv16qi3): New define_expand.
> >>> >
> >>> > [gcc/testsuite]
> >>> >
> >>> > 2015-09-03  Bill Schmidt  <wschmidt@vnet.linux.ibm.com>
> >>> >
> >>> >         * gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mult-char-1.c: New test.
> >>> >         * gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mult-char-2.c: New test.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Index: gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md
> >>> > ===================================================================
> >>> > --- gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md        (revision 227416)
> >>> > +++ gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md        (working copy)
> >>> > @@ -1957,6 +1957,16 @@
> >>> >    "vperm %0,%1,%2,%3"
> >>> >    [(set_attr "type" "vecperm")])
> >>> >
> >>> > +(define_insn "altivec_vperm_v8hiv16qi"
> >>> > +  [(set (match_operand:V16QI 0 "register_operand" "=v")
> >>> > +       (unspec:V16QI [(match_operand:V8HI 1 "register_operand" "v")
> >>> > +                      (match_operand:V8HI 2 "register_operand" "v")
> >>> > +                      (match_operand:V16QI 3 "register_operand" "v")]
> >>> > +                  UNSPEC_VPERM))]
> >>> > +  "TARGET_ALTIVEC"
> >>> > +  "vperm %0,%1,%2,%3"
> >>> > +  [(set_attr "type" "vecperm")])
> >>> > +
> >>> >  (define_expand "altivec_vperm_<mode>_uns"
> >>> >    [(set (match_operand:VM 0 "register_operand" "=v")
> >>> >         (unspec:VM [(match_operand:VM 1 "register_operand" "v")
> >>> > @@ -3161,6 +3171,34 @@
> >>> >    "<VI_unit>"
> >>> >    "")
> >>> >
> >>> > +(define_expand "mulv16qi3"
> >>> > +  [(set (match_operand:V16QI 0 "register_operand" "=v")
> >>> > +        (mult:V16QI (match_operand:V16QI 1 "register_operand" "v")
> >>> > +                    (match_operand:V16QI 2 "register_operand" "v")))]
> >>> > +  "TARGET_ALTIVEC"
> >>> > +  "
> >>> > +{
> >>> > +  rtx even = gen_reg_rtx (V8HImode);
> >>> > +  rtx odd = gen_reg_rtx (V8HImode);
> >>> > +  rtx mask = gen_reg_rtx (V16QImode);
> >>> > +  rtvec v = rtvec_alloc (16);
> >>> > +  bool be = BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN;
> >>> > +  int i;
> >>> > +
> >>> > +  for (i = 0; i < 8; ++i) {
> >>> > +    RTVEC_ELT (v, 2 * i)
> >>> > +     = gen_rtx_CONST_INT (QImode, be ? 2 * i + 1 : 31 - 2 * i);
> >>> > +    RTVEC_ELT (v, 2 * i + 1)
> >>> > +     = gen_rtx_CONST_INT (QImode, be ? 2 * i + 17 : 15 - 2 * i);
> >>> > +  }
> >>> > +
> >>> > +  emit_insn (gen_vec_initv16qi (mask, gen_rtx_PARALLEL (V16QImode, v)));
> >>> > +  emit_insn (gen_altivec_vmulesb (even, operands[1], operands[2]));
> >>> > +  emit_insn (gen_altivec_vmulosb (odd, operands[1], operands[2]));
> >>> > +  emit_insn (gen_altivec_vperm_v8hiv16qi (operands[0], even, odd, mask));
> >>> > +  DONE;
> >>> > +}")
> >>> > +
> >>> >  (define_expand "altivec_negv4sf2"
> >>> >    [(use (match_operand:V4SF 0 "register_operand" ""))
> >>> >     (use (match_operand:V4SF 1 "register_operand" ""))]
> >>> > Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mult-char-1.c
> >>> > ===================================================================
> >>> > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mult-char-1.c  (revision 0)
> >>> > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mult-char-1.c  (working copy)
> >>> > @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> >>> > +/* { dg-do run { target { powerpc*-*-* && vmx_hw } } } */
> >>> > +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_altivec_ok } */
> >>> > +/* { dg-options "-maltivec" } */
> >>> > +
> >>> > +#include <altivec.h>
> >>> > +
> >>> > +extern void abort (void);
> >>> > +
> >>> > +vector unsigned char vmului(vector unsigned char v,
> >>> > +                           vector unsigned char i)
> >>> > +{
> >>> > +       return v * i;
> >>> > +}
> >>> > +
> >>> > +vector signed char vmulsi(vector signed char v,
> >>> > +                         vector signed char i)
> >>> > +{
> >>> > +       return v * i;
> >>> > +}
> >>> > +
> >>> > +int main ()
> >>> > +{
> >>> > +  vector unsigned char a = {2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16,
> >>> > +                           18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32};
> >>> > +  vector unsigned char b = {3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24,
> >>> > +                           27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48};
> >>> > +  vector unsigned char c = vmului (a, b);
> >>> > +  vector unsigned char expect_c = {6, 24, 54, 96, 150, 216, 38, 128,
> >>> > +                                  230, 88, 214, 96, 246, 152, 70, 0};
> >>> > +
> >>> > +  vector signed char d = {2, -4, 6, -8, 10, -12, 14, -16,
> >>> > +                         18, -20, 22, -24, 26, -28, 30, -32};
> >>> > +  vector signed char e = {3, 6, -9, -12, 15, 18, -21, -24,
> >>> > +                         27, 30, -33, -36, 39, 42, -45, -48};
> >>> > +  vector signed char f = vmulsi (d, e);
> >>> > +  vector signed char expect_f = {6, -24, -54, 96, -106, 40, -38, -128,
> >>> > +                                -26, -88, 42, 96, -10, 104, -70, 0};
> >>> > +
> >>> > +  vector signed char g = {127, -128, 126, -126, 125, -125,  124, -124,
> >>> > +                         123, -123, 122, -122, 121, -121,  120, -120};
> >>> > +  vector signed char h = {  2,    2,  -2,   -2, 127,  127, -128, -128,
> >>> > +                           10,  10, -10,  -10,  64,   65,  -64,  -65};
> >>> > +  vector signed char i = vmulsi (g, h);
> >>> > +  vector signed char expect_i = {-2, 0, 4, -4, 3, -3, 0, 0,
> >>> > +                                -50, 50, 60, -60, 64, 71, 0, 120};
> >>> > +
> >>> > +  if (!vec_all_eq (c, expect_c))
> >>> > +    abort ();
> >>> > +  if (!vec_all_eq (f, expect_f))
> >>> > +    abort ();
> >>> > +  if (!vec_all_eq (i, expect_i))
> >>> > +    abort ();
> >>> > +}
> >>> > Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mult-char-2.c
> >>> > ===================================================================
> >>> > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mult-char-2.c  (revision 0)
> >>> > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vec-mult-char-2.c  (working copy)
> >>> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> >>> > +/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* && vmx_hw } } } */
> >>> > +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_altivec_ok } */
> >>> > +/* { dg-options "-maltivec" } */
> >>> > +
> >>> > +#include <altivec.h>
> >>> > +
> >>> > +vector unsigned char vmului(vector unsigned char v,
> >>> > +                           vector unsigned char i)
> >>> > +{
> >>> > +       return v * i;
> >>> > +}
> >>> > +
> >>> > +vector signed char vmulsi(vector signed char v,
> >>> > +                         vector signed char i)
> >>> > +{
> >>> > +       return v * i;
> >>> > +}
> >>> > +
> >>> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmulesb" 2 } } */
> >>> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vmulosb" 2 } } */
> >>> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "vperm" 2 } } */
> >>> > Index: gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> >>> > ===================================================================
> >>> > --- gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp       (revision 227416)
> >>> > +++ gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp       (working copy)
> >>> > @@ -4577,7 +4577,8 @@ proc check_effective_target_vect_char_mult { } {
> >>> >         if { [istarget aarch64*-*-*]
> >>> >              || [istarget ia64-*-*]
> >>> >              || [istarget i?86-*-*] || [istarget x86_64-*-*]
> >>> > -            || [check_effective_target_arm32] } {
> >>> > +             || [check_effective_target_arm32]
> >>> > +            || [check_effective_target_powerpc_altivec] } {
> >>> >            set et_vect_char_mult_saved 1
> >>> >         }
> >>> >      }
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> 



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]