This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] [PING] [PR libitm/61164] Remove redefinition of glibc internal macro __always_inline


On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 13:16 +0200, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 07:35:17PM +0200, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 14:36 +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 17:54 +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
> > > > > 2015-05-06  Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy  <glebfm@altlinux.org>
> > > > > 
> > > > > 	PR libitm/61164
> > > > > 	* local_atomic (__always_inline): Rename to...
> > > > > 	(__libitm_always_inline): ... this.
> > > > 
> > > > OK.  Thanks.
> > > 
> > > You are welcome.
> > > 
> > > It seems still not applied, AFAICS.
> > 
> > I forgot to ask you at Cauldron whether you have completed a copyright
> > assignment agreement?
> 
> No, I didn't. I'm in progress.
> 
> >  I don't think this is small enough to be a
> > trivial patch.
> 
> "A regular series of repeated changes, such as renaming a symbol, is not
> legally significant even if the symbol has to be renamed in many places."
> https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Legally-Significant.html#Legally-Significant

OK.  I committed this to trunk for you, with the "(tiny change)" marker
in the ChangeLog as suggested on this GNU web page.




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]