This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PRs 66502 and 67167


Richard Biener writes:

> I see the following ICE:
>
> t.c:13:1: internal compiler error: in decompose_normal_address, at 
> rtlanal.c:6090
>  }
>  ^
> 0xc94a37 decompose_normal_address
>         /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/rtlanal.c:6090
> 0xc94d25 decompose_address(address_info*, rtx_def**, machine_mode, 
> unsigned char, rtx_code)
>         /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/rtlanal.c:6167
> 0xc94dc3 decompose_mem_address(address_info*, rtx_def*)
>         /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/rtlanal.c:6187
> 0xb61149 process_address_1
>         /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/lra-constraints.c:2867
> 0xb61c4e process_address
>         /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/lra-constraints.c:3124
> 0xb62607 curr_insn_transform
>         /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/lra-constraints.c:3419
> 0xb65250 lra_constraints(bool)
>         /space/rguenther/tramp3d/trunk/gcc/lra-constraints.c:4421
>
> that looks like a latent issue to me in an area of GCC I am not
> familiar with.  I suggest to open a bugreport and CC Vladimir.

Thanks for the info. Done https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67305


>
> The r226850 change caused us to eliminate an induction variable
> early (I suspect IVOPTs would have done this later anyway, but
> I did not verify that):
>
> Replaced redundant PHI node defining bl_2 with c_1
> Replaced c_1 + 1 with bl_15 in all uses of c_16 = c_1 + 1;
> Removing dead stmt c_16 = c_1 + 1;
> Removing dead stmt bl_2 = PHI <0(2), bl_15(3)>
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
>
>>   Thanks.
>> 

-- 
Regards,
Jiong


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]