This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [AArch64] Break -mcpu tie between the compiler and assembler
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- To: James Greenhalgh <james dot greenhalgh at arm dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus dot shawcroft at arm dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <richard dot earnshaw at arm dot com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 23:43:27 +0800
- Subject: Re: [AArch64] Break -mcpu tie between the compiler and assembler
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1439998779-15761-1-git-send-email-james dot greenhalgh at arm dot com>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:39 PM, James Greenhalgh
<james.greenhalgh@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch has been sitting in my tree for a while - it comes in handy
> when trying out bootstrap or test with -mcpu values like -mcpu=cortex-a72
> with a system assmebler which trails trunk binutils.
>
> Essentially, we rewrite -mcpu=foo to a -march flag providing the same
> architecture revision and set of optional architecture features. There
> is no reason we should ever need the assembler to see a CPU name, it
> should only be interested in the architecture variant.
>
> While we're there I've long found this function too fragile and hard
> to grok in C. So I've rewritten it in C++ to use std::string rather than
> raw C strings. Making this work with extension strings requires a slight
> refactor to the existing extension printing code to pull it across to
> somewhere common.
>
> Note that this also stops us from having to pick through a big.LITTLE
> target to find and separate the core names - we can just look up the
> architecture of the whole target and use that.
>
> The new function does leak the allocation of a C string to hold the
> result, but looking at gcc.c:getenv_spec_function and
> gcc.c:replace_extension_spec_func this is the usual thing to do.
>
> This has been through an aarch64-none-linux-gnu bootstrap and test run,
> configured with --with-cpu=cortex-a72 , which my system assembler does
> not understand.
>
> Ok?
I like this since this helps me not having to have a newer assembler
for -mcpu=thunderx. Though I still need it for LSE support in the
assembler. Has anyone thought about adding a configure test for v8.1
(LSE and other) support and disabling those extensions (yes this is
the same issue on x86_64 with AVX)?
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> ---
> 2015-08-19 James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>
>
> * common/config/aarch64/aarch64-common.c
> (AARCH64_CPU_NAME_LENGTH): Delete.
> (aarch64_option_extension): New.
> (all_extensions): Likewise.
> (processor_name_to_arch): Likewise.
> (arch_to_arch_name): Likewise.
> (all_cores): New.
> (all_architectures): Likewise.
> (aarch64_get_extension_string_for_isa_flags): Likewise.
> (aarch64_rewrite_selected_cpu): Change to rewrite CPU names to
> architecture names.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h
> (aarch64_get_extension_string_for_isa_flags): New.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_print_extension): Delete.
> (aarch64_option_print): Get the string to print from
> aarch64_get_extension_string_for_isa_flags.
> (aarch64_declare_function_name): Likewise.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (BIG_LITTLE_SPEC): Rename to...
> (MCPU_TO_MARCH_SPEC): This.
> (ASM_CPU_SPEC): Use it.
> (BIG_LITTLE_SPEC_FUNCTIONS): Rename to...
> (MCPU_TO_MARCH_SPEC_FUNCTIONS): ...This.
> (EXTRA_SPEC_FUNCTIONS): Use it.
>