This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 08/12/2015 10:24 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
If you're comfortable with Go at this point and we have mechanisms in place to ensure Go only gets built on platforms that support Go, then I think we should go forward with replacing GCJ with Go.On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> wrote:Jeff> In the past this has stalled on issues like how will asynch-exceptions Jeff> be tested and the like. It seems to me that either there is some other language which needs this -- in which case that language ought to have testing for the feature -- or the feature is only used by gcj, in which case it doesn't matter. Of course is!=ought; but relying on gcj and libjava to provide this small amount of testing seems like a bad cost/benefit tradeoff.Go does use asynchronous exceptions, and has test cases that rely on them working.
Jeff
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |