This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [committed, gomp4] Fix release_dangling_ssa_names


On 05/08/15 11:30, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:

On 05/08/15 09:29, Richard Biener wrote:
This patch fixes that by making sure we reset the def stmt to NULL. This
means
we can simplify release_dangling_ssa_names to just test for NULL def
stmts.
Not sure if I understand the problem correctly but why are you not simply
releasing the SSA name when you remove its definition?

In move_sese_region_to_fn we move a region of blocks from one function to
another, bit by bit.

When we encounter an ssa_name as def or use in the region, we:
- generate a new ssa_name,
- set the def stmt of the old name as def stmt of the new name, and
- add a mapping from the old to the new name.
The next time we encounter the same ssa_name in another statement, we find it
in the map.

If we release the old ssa name, we effectively create statements with operands
in the free-list. The first point where that cause breakage, is in
walk_gimple_op, which expects the TREE_TYPE of the lhs of an assign to be
defined, which is not the case if it's in the free-list:
...
case GIMPLE_ASSIGN:
   /* Walk the RHS operands.  If the LHS is of a non-renamable type or
      is a register variable, we may use a COMPONENT_REF on the RHS.*/
   if (wi)
     {
       tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (stmt);
       wi->val_only
         = (is_gimple_reg_type (TREE_TYPE (lhs)) && !is_gimple_reg (lhs))
            || gimple_assign_rhs_class (stmt) != GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS;
     }
...

Hmm, ok, probably because the stmt moving doesn't happen in DOM
order (move defs before uses).  But


There seems to be similar code for the rhs, so I don't think changing the order would fix anything.

+
+      if (!SSA_NAME_IS_DEFAULT_DEF (name))
+       /* The statement has been moved to the child function.  It no
longer
+          defines name in the original function.  Mark the def stmt NULL,
and
+          let release_dangling_ssa_names deal with it.  */
+       SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (name) = NULL;

applies also to uses - I don't see why it couldn't happen that you
move a use but not its def (the def would be a parameter to the
split-out function).  You'd wreck the IL of the source function this way.


If you first move a use, you create a mapping. When you encounter the def, you use the mapping. Indeed, if the def is a default def, we don't encounter the def. Which is why we create a nop as defining def for those cases. The default def in the source function still has a defining nop, and has no uses anymore. I don't understand what is broken here.

I think that the whole dance of actually moving things instead of
just copying it isn't worth the extra maintainance (well, if we already
have a machinery duplicating a SESE region to another function - I
suppose gimple_duplicate_sese_region could be trivially changed to
support that).


I'll mention that as todo. For now, I think the fastest way to get a working version is to fix move_sese_region_to_fn.

Trunk doesn't have release_dangling_ssa_names it seems

Yep, I only ran into this trouble for the kernels region handling. But I don't exclude the possibility it could happen for trunk as well.

but I think
it belongs to move_sese_region_to_fn and not to omp-low.c

Makes sense indeed.

and it
could also just walk the d->vars_map replace_ssa_name fills to
iterate over the removal candidates

Agreed, I suppose in general that's a win over iterating over all the ssa names.

(and if the situation of
moving uses but not defs cannot happen you don't need any
SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT dance either).

I'd prefer to keep the SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT () = NULL bit. It makes sure a stmt is the defining stmt of only one ssa-name at all times.

I'll prepare a patch for trunk then.

Thanks,
- Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]