This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [libstdc++/67015, patch] Fix regex POSIX bracket parsing
- From: Tim Shen <timshen at google dot com>
- To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 01:56:17 -0700
- Subject: Re: [libstdc++/67015, patch] Fix regex POSIX bracket parsing
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAG4ZjNmXSJ306ib90i31++qm5HuXH2Ynf7SaMPx-9QLWUGQO1Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAG4ZjN=99FjiPnG_FaUVKnpY65qgSKUqaFC-x42=198Y0A+Kew at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150727114531 dot GA6100 at redhat dot com> <CAG4ZjNnA=tHCiKmbUyXnokomDpUTc+DmPybz4ajDkqcjVvwY8A at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150728102719 dot GJ10878 at redhat dot com> <CAG4ZjNmhRzjBjZTL=ej1U3n6KkTRoBDRKcCmwkzj3GVzFfYAvw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150729083521 dot GC13355 at redhat dot com>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
> The 4.9 branch is the oldest one we still support, so should be very
> stable now, although C++11 support in 4.9 is still labelled
> experimental, and this only changes C++11 code. How important is it to
> fix?
Um... I'd say medium importance, for [a-z0-9-] not working in POSIX
syntax (while ECMAScript seems to be more popular, which works
correctly).
If 4.9 is `stable` and expected to be experimetal, which by my
definition should only include important changes, we may leave it as
is?
--
Regards,
Tim Shen