This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 28/07/15 21:44 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:On 27/07/15 19:40 -0700, Tim Shen wrote:Done by s/_M_add_collating_element/_M_add_collate_element/.Great, thanks. OK for trunk and gcc-5-branch.Committed. Is there no need for gcc-4_9-branch? What's the general policy for backporting fixes?
In general, only fixes for regressions (and changes to documentation or tests) should be backported. The 4.9 branch is the oldest one we still support, so should be very stable now, although C++11 support in 4.9 is still labelled experimental, and this only changes C++11 code. How important is it to fix?
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |