This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[PATCH][AArch64] Handle -|x| case using a single csneg
- From: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo dot tkachov at arm dot com>
- To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: Marcus Shawcroft <marcus dot shawcroft at arm dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>, James Greenhalgh <james dot greenhalgh at arm dot com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:48:19 +0100
- Subject: [PATCH][AArch64] Handle -|x| case using a single csneg
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Hi all,
For the testcase in the patch we were generating an extra neg instruction:
cmp w0, wzr
csneg w0, w0, w0, ge
neg w0, w0
ret
instead of the optimal:
cmp w0, wzr
csneg w0, w0, w0, lt
ret
The reason is that combine tries to merge the operation into a negation of an abs.
I considered teaching combine not to do that but it would require telling it that it shouldn't
do it if there is a conditional negate instruction. There's no optab for that though :(
Also, we already advertise that we have an abs optab, even though we expand to a compare and
a csneg anyway. This patch was the cleanest way I could do this. We just match the neg of an abs
and generate the same csneg sequence as for normal abs, just with the comparison condition inverted.
Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Kyrill
2015-07-13 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
* config/aarch64/aarch64.md (*absneg2<mode>_insn): New
define_and_split.
2015-07-13 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
* gcc.target/aarch64/neg-abs_1.c: New test.
commit 7527a76d25067ce4a5426e563e162487604ac6c1
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
Date: Thu Jul 9 16:54:23 2015 +0100
[AArch64] Handle -|x| case using a single csneg
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
index e6d0764..6664d1a 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
@@ -2333,6 +2333,29 @@ (define_expand "abs<mode>2"
}
)
+;; Combine will try merging (c > 0 ? -x : x) into (-|x|). This isn't a good
+;; idea if the target has a conditional negate instruction and no integer
+;; abs instruction, but the midend doesn't have an optab for conditional neg
+;; and we advertise an optab for abs, so match that case here and emit the
+;; optimal CSNEG variant.
+(define_insn_and_split "*absneg2<mode>_insn"
+ [(set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
+ (neg:GPI
+ (abs:GPI (match_operand:GPI 1 "register_operand" "r"))))]
+ ""
+ "#"
+ ""
+ [(const_int 0)]
+ {
+ rtx ccreg = aarch64_gen_compare_reg (LT, operands[1], const0_rtx);
+ rtx x = gen_rtx_GE (VOIDmode, ccreg, const0_rtx);
+ emit_insn (gen_csneg3<mode>_insn (operands[0], x, operands[1],
+ operands[1]));
+ DONE;
+ }
+ [(set_attr "type" "csel")]
+)
+
(define_insn "neg<mode>2"
[(set (match_operand:GPI 0 "register_operand" "=r,w")
(neg:GPI (match_operand:GPI 1 "register_operand" "r,w")))]
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/neg-abs_1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/neg-abs_1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cb2a387
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/neg-abs_1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-save-temps -O2" } */
+
+int
+f1 (int x)
+{
+ return x < 0 ? x : -x;
+}
+
+long long
+f2 (long long x)
+{
+ return x < 0 ? x : -x;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tneg\tw\[0-9\]*.*" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tneg\tx\[0-9\]*.*" } } */