This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: [Patch,tree-optimization]: Add new path Splitting pass on tree ssa representation
- From: Ajit Kumar Agarwal <ajit dot kumar dot agarwal at xilinx dot com>
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "law at redhat dot com" <law at redhat dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Vinod Kathail <vinodk at xilinx dot com>, Shail Aditya Gupta <shailadi at xilinx dot com>, Vidhumouli Hunsigida <vidhum at xilinx dot com>, Nagaraju Mekala <nmekala at xilinx dot com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 03:51:56 +0000
- Subject: RE: [Patch,tree-optimization]: Add new path Splitting pass on tree ssa representation
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 149.199.60.100) smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; gcc.gnu.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
- References: <37378DC5BCD0EE48BA4B082E0B55DFAA41F3F56C at XAP-PVEXMBX02 dot xlnx dot xilinx dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1506302216120 dot 16184 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Myers [mailto:joseph@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 3:48 AM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Cc: law@redhat.com; GCC Patches; Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: [Patch,tree-optimization]: Add new path Splitting pass on tree ssa representation
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
> * gcc/common.opt: Add the new flag ftree-path-split.
>>All options need documenting in invoke.texi.
Sure.
> +#include "tm.h"
>>Why? Does some other header depend on this, or are you using a target macro?
I am not using any target macro. There are many header files that includes the tm.h and also there are many tree-ssa optimization
files that have included "tm.h" listing some of them tree-ssa-threadupdate.c tree-vrp.c , tree-ssa-threadedge.c.
Thanks & Regards
Ajit
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com