This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 06/04/2015 08:27 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
You're looking to add a lot of generality to this GDB feature, but I'm not convinced that generality is ultimately going to be useful. Thus, I'm not sure that a right place exists at all.On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 16:00:18 +0200, Jeff Law wrote:But my assertion is that stuff like what you've shown above simply isn't important to handle. What we need to look at are the common cases and I haven't seen a strong argument that the common cases can't be handled by gdb.If we target only 99% of cases then sure GDB-side is enough. Still the GDB side will be more code and IMHO at an inappropriate place. I was tought + expect that in GNU world it does not matter where a feature is implemented, it is more important to be implemented at the right place.
jeff
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |