This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, testsuite]: Cleanup dumps
- From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep dot dot dot nop at gmail dot com>
- To: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 10:21:55 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, testsuite]: Cleanup dumps
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAFULd4Z=DM4GwUfBJVugNXsm0XM6-9eB5cwH0gxOwC+QKtQ7sg at mail dot gmail dot com> <7B4175B2-2FAA-4A96-943B-06B379D03C75 at gmail dot com> <4420E8FB-D61F-4F61-8A86-6ADE01B235E9 at comcast dot net> <FFFCE31D-72C2-4542-9A1D-2C67E8DE07D8 at gmail dot com>
On 31 January 2015 at 22:10, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
<rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
> On January 31, 2015 9:17:57 PM GMT+01:00, Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net> wrote:
>>On Jan 31, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>><rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On January 31, 2015 10:53:39 AM GMT+01:00, Uros Bizjak
>><ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> Reminds me of just auto-wiping dump files:
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg02506.html
>>
>>> Mike, WDYT?
>>
>>Ok.
>>
>>My only concern of speed isnât founded, as you stated it was faster to
>>scan the flags.
>>
>>I think Iâm fine with it going in now, but, if you do, you have to
>>watch for and resolve any fallout. Watch for RM comments, Iâd defer to
>>them on timing.
>>
>>If you want to wait until stage 1, thatâs fine too.
>
> I'd only want that to go in in stage 1.
I have applied this now as r223858.
Please CC me on fallout.
Thanks,