This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value to output_constant_pool_2


On 04/28/2015 03:44 AM, rohitarulraj@freescale.com wrote:
Ping.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 7:57 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rguenther@suse.de; Jakub Jelinek
Cc: Alan Modra; David Edelsohn; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797; Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
Subject: RE: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value to output_constant_pool_2

Hi,

I would like to resubmit these patches for comments. The previous detailed discussion is available in the below mentioned link.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01679.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00489.html

The issue is still reproducible on GCC v4.8 branch.

I have tested both the attached patches with e500v2 tool chain on GCC v4.8 branch [rev 221667] and GCC trunk [rev 221310] with no regressions.

Patch1 [gcc.fix_pr60158_fixup_table_fsf_1]: Pass actual alignment value to output_constant_pool_2.
Patch2 [gcc.fix_pr60158_fixup_table_fsf_2]: Use the alignment data available in the first argument (constant_descriptor_rtx) of output_constant_pool_1.
         (Note: this generates ".align" directive twice).
Are you asking for both patches to be applied or just one?

Jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]