This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, 5.1, rs6000] Fix PR65787
- From: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, dje dot gcc at gmail dot com
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:29:46 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, 5.1, rs6000] Fix PR65787
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1429220775 dot 20720 dot 4 dot camel at gnopaine> <1429273663 dot 20720 dot 6 dot camel at gnopaine> <1429277282 dot 20720 dot 8 dot camel at gnopaine> <20150417144938 dot GR1725 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <1429282924 dot 20720 dot 13 dot camel at gnopaine> <1429288364 dot 20720 dot 17 dot camel at gnopaine> <20150417163959 dot GS1725 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <20150417174652 dot GT1725 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <1429293982 dot 20720 dot 19 dot camel at gnopaine> <20150417182746 dot GU1725 at tucnak dot redhat dot com>
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 20:27 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 01:06:22PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > Yep, thanks -- I just finished testing that, and it fixes the problem
> > with no regressions. Thanks for the help.
> >
> > Is this ok to commit?
>
> If David is ok with it, it is fine with me too. But, please commit to both
> gcc-5-branch and the trunk, your last commit only went to the branch and not
> to the trunk.
Yes, absolutely. I was about to push it to trunk when I found out it
was inadequate, so I held off. I'll push the combined correct patch
there as well.
Thank you again for your help!
Bill
>
> Jakub
>
- References:
- [PATCH, 5.1, rs6000] Fix PR65787
- Re: [PATCH, 5.1, rs6000] Fix PR65787
- Re: [PATCH, 5.1, rs6000] Fix PR65787
- Re: [PATCH, 5.1, rs6000] Fix PR65787
- Re: [PATCH, 5.1, rs6000] Fix PR65787
- Re: [PATCH, 5.1, rs6000] Fix PR65787
- Re: [PATCH, 5.1, rs6000] Fix PR65787
- Re: [PATCH, 5.1, rs6000] Fix PR65787
- Re: [PATCH, 5.1, rs6000] Fix PR65787
- Re: [PATCH, 5.1, rs6000] Fix PR65787