This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PING^2] [PATCH][5b/5] Avoid running expand_ifn_va_arg_1 in functions without va_arg


On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:

> [stage1 ping^2]
> On 10-03-15 16:31, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > [stage1 ping]
> > [was: Postpone expanding va_arg until pass_stdarg]
> > On 24-02-15 07:48, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > On 23-02-15 11:09, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > > On 23-02-15 09:26, Michael Matz wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Sun, 22 Feb 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Btw, I'm wondering if as run-time optimization we can tentatively
> > > > > > set
> > > > > > PROP_gimple_lva at the start of the gimple pass, and unset it in
> > > > > > gimplify_va_arg_expr. That way we would avoid the loop in
> > > > > > expand_ifn_va_arg_1 (over all bbs and gimples) in functions without
> > > > > > va_arg.
> > > > > 
> > > > > That makes sense.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I'll put this follow-up patch through testing.
> > > 
> > > Bootstrapped and reg-tested as before together with the rest of the patch
> > > series.
> > > 
> > > OK for stage1?
> > > 
> > 
> > Ping.
> > 
> 
> Ping again.
> 
> Patch originally posted at:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01402.html .

Ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

> Thanks,
> - Tom
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild,
Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]