This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, fortran, RFC] First steps towards inlining matmul

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at charter dot net>
To: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at netcologne dot de>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2015 06:20:33 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch, fortran, RFC] First steps towards inlining matmul
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <55212B5D dot 6010309 at netcologne dot de>

On 04/05/2015 05:32 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
--- snip ---


So, what do you think about this?

	Thomas

I am curious about what performance gain results from this? I can see saving alibrary call to our runtime libraries. Do you have some timing results?


Jerry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch, fortran, RFC] First steps towards inlining matmul
  - From: Thomas Koenig

References:
- [patch, fortran, RFC] First steps towards inlining matmul
  - From: Thomas Koenig

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]