This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, The issue is also present in 4.9 branch as explained in: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65647 As 4.9 doesn't contains lra rematerialization passe, we only need to stop updating lra_constraint_new_regno_start when inheritance is switched off. Bootstrapped and tested on x64_64 and cross built and tested on AArch64, arm, armeb and i686. Ok for 4.9 ? Cheers, Yvan 2015-04-05 Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@linaro.org> Backport from trunk r221867 2015-04-04 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> PR target/65647 * lra.c (lra): Stop updating lra_constraint_new_regno_start after switching off inheritance. 2015-04-05 Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@linaro.org> Backport from trunk r221867 2015-04-04 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> PR target/65647 * gcc.target/arm/pr65647.c: New. * gcc.target/arm/pr65647-2.c: New. On 4 April 2015 at 16:39, Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> wrote: > The following patch fixes > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65647 > > This very complicated problem occurred in rare cases when chain of reloads > involving at least two pseudos and insns were generated and one pseudo was > spilled on later sub-passes after spilling sub-pass and this pattern > happened to be repeated. > > The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64, ppc64, and aarch64. > > Committed as rev.221867. > > 2015-04-04 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> > > PR target/65647 > * lra-int.h (LRA_MAX_REMATERIALIZATION_PASSES): New. Add its > value checking. > (lra_rematerialization_iter): New. > * lra.c (lra): Initialize lra_rematerialization_iter. > Stop updating lra_constraint_new_regno_start after switching of > inheritance and rematerialization. > * lra-remat.c (lra_rematerialization_iter): New. > (lra_remat): Add printing pass iteration. Do rematerialization > only first LRA_MAX_REMATERIALIZATION_PASSES iterations. > > 2015-04-04 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com> > > PR target/65647 > * gcc.target/arm/pr65647.c: New. > >
Attachment:
pr65647.diff
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |