This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, c] PR c/48956: diagnostics for conversions involving complex types
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Mikhail Maltsev <maltsevm at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:33:43 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, c] PR c/48956: diagnostics for conversions involving complex types
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20141229174555 dot 79e9defd at debian-miyuki> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1501300010300 dot 14904 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <6F9F1701-C4DF-4307-8508-2A63C74916C4 at comcast dot net> <CA+=Sn1kMbxyOWXNbHbLdV-a45uZhmWdORkeydyVTVFqGuz539Q at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Jan 29, 2015, at 7:16 PM, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net> wrote:
>> On Jan 29, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>> The patch is OK for GCC 6
>>
>> We will be releasing 5.x compilers for the next decade?! Does he really have to wait 10 years?
>>
>> Why not, just OK for stage 1?
>
> You missed the memo on the versioning scheme change. GCC 5.1 is going
> to the first released version of GCC 5. GCC 5.2 will be the next
> patched version of GCC 5. GCC 6 is the next major release of GCC.
Ah, I kinda discounted that as it went by it seems. It seems most other players go the other way, as the numbers get large, the first one fixes, and then they add numbers at the bottom. Thanks.