This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [PATCH] Fix sporadic failure in g++.dg/tsan/aligned_vs_unaligned_race.C



----------------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:16:33 +0100
> From: jakub@redhat.com
> To: bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de
> CC: mikestump@comcast.net; hjl.tools@gmail.com; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; dvyukov@google.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix sporadic failure in g++.dg/tsan/aligned_vs_unaligned_race.C
>
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:08:22AM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> after some hours of sleep I realized that your step function can do something very interesting,
>> (which you already requested previously):
>>
>> That is: create a race condition that is _always_ at 100% missed by tsan:
>>
>> cat lib.c
>> /* { dg-do compile } */
>> /* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-sanitize=all" } */
>>
>> static volatile int serial = 0;
>>
>> void step (int i)
>> {
>>   while (__atomic_load_n (&serial, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) != i - 1);
>>   __atomic_store_n (&serial, i, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
>> }
>
> Such busy waiting is not very CPU time friendly in the testsuite, especially
> if you have just a single HW thread.
> If libtsan is not fixed not to be so racy, perhaps instead of all the sleeps
> we could arrange (on x86_64-linux, which is the only target supporting tsan
> right now) to make sure the thread runs on the same core/hw thread as the
> initial thread using pthread_[gs]etaffinity_np/pthread_attr_setaffinity_np ?
> Does tsan then always report the races when the threads can't run
> concurrently?
>
> Jakub

I tried your suggestion now, and it seems to work. (on a  4-way core AMD64 laptop)

Would you prefer this over adding a sleep in Thread1, which I posted previously?




2015-01-06  Bernd Edlinger  <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>

        * g++.dg/tsan/aligned_vs_unaligned_race.C: Fixed sporadic failure.


Index: aligned_vs_unaligned_race.C
===================================================================
--- aligned_vs_unaligned_race.C    (revision 219198)
+++ aligned_vs_unaligned_race.C    (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 /* { dg-shouldfail "tsan" } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-pthread" } */
 #include <pthread.h>
+#include <sched.h>
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdint.h>
 
@@ -19,6 +21,12 @@ void *Thread2(void *x) {
 }
 
 int main() {
+  /* Run this test on a single CPU, to make it somewhat easier for tsan to
+     detect the race condition.  */
+  cpu_set_t s;
+  CPU_ZERO(&s);
+  CPU_SET(0, &s);
+  pthread_setaffinity_np(pthread_self(), sizeof(s), &s);
   pthread_t t[2];
   pthread_create(&t[0], NULL, Thread1, NULL);
   pthread_create(&t[1], NULL, Thread2, NULL);



Thanks,
Bernd.
 		 	   		  

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]