This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/2, PR 63814] Do not re-create expanded artificial thunks


Hi,

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:43:19PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 08:18:12PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > when debugging PR 63814 I noticed that when cgraph_node::create_clone
> > > was using redirect_edge_duplicating_thunks to redirect two edges to a
> > > thunk of a clone, two thunks were created, one for each edge.  The
> > > reason is that even though duplicate_thunk_for_node attempts to locate
> > > an already created thunk, it does so by looking for a caller with
> > > thunk.thunk_p set and the previously created one does not have it set
> > > because (on i686) expand_thunk has expanded the thunk to gimple and
> > > cleared the flag.
> > > 
> > > This patch fixes the issue by marking such expanded thunks with yet
> > > another flag and then uses the flag to identify such expanded thunks.
> > > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux.  Honza, do you
> > > think this is a good approach?  Is the patch OK for trunk?
> 
> Hmm, I was sort of hoping to drop the whole .thunk structure into summary and
> do not keep it for functions with Gimple body, so this change will imply the
> need to keep this datastructure for thunks that are already expanded.
> moreover we do not stream the flag, so not all expanded thunks are handled,
> only those that was introduced during WPA.
> 
> It may be cleaner to simply donot expand thunks proactively before all
> the clonning is finished?
> 

I did not really like it either (although I must say that in general I
really dislike the need to call expand_thunk but telling it to not
really expand anything if possible).  So here is another approach,
which works by delaying expansion of thunks but only after all
redirections within create_clone are done.  This has the advantage
that the new method expand_all_artificial_thunks is not exposed to
every (indirect) user of cgraph_node::create_clone (as opposed to
requiring them all to call that function at some point after making
any redirections at all).  However, it also has the disadvantage that
in the unlikeliest of circumstances (strongly connected components in
IPA-CP value dependencies connected by thunks and these thunks ceasing
to be assembly thunks in the course of cloning at the same time),
IPA-CP might still create extra gimple-expanded thunks.

The alternative not suffering from this problem would be either
exposing expand_all_artificial_thunks to all users and requiring them
to call it, with IPA-CP doing it for all created clones at the very
end of propagation, or teaching the infrastructure and pass manager
about this and then expanding them at some convenient time
(before/after inlining?).  However, the first option seems to be too
ugly for very little benefit (but I am willing to implement that) and
the second does not seem to be stage3 material.

What do you think?  Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux.

Martin


2014-12-02  Martin Jambor  <mjambor@suse.cz>

	* cgraph.h (cgraph_node): New method expand_all_artificial_thunks.
	(cgraph_edge): New method redirect_callee_duplicating_thunks.
	* cgraphclones.c (duplicate_thunk_for_node): Donot expand newly
	created thunks.
	(redirect_edge_duplicating_thunks): Turned into edge method
	redirect_callee_duplicating_thunks.
	(cgraph_node::expand_all_artificial_thunks): New method.
	(create_clone): Call expand_all_artificial_thunks.
	* ipa-cp.c (perhaps_add_new_callers): Call
	redirect_callee_duplicating_thunks instead of redirect_callee.
	Also call expand_all_artificial_thunks.

Index: src/gcc/cgraph.h
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gcc/cgraph.h
+++ src/gcc/cgraph.h
@@ -908,6 +908,10 @@ public:
      thunks that are not lowered.  */
   bool expand_thunk (bool output_asm_thunks, bool force_gimple_thunk);
 
+  /*  Call expand_thunk on all callers that are thunks and if analyze those
+      nodes that were expanded.  */
+  void expand_all_artificial_thunks ();
+
   /* Assemble thunks and aliases associated to node.  */
   void assemble_thunks_and_aliases (void);
 
@@ -1477,6 +1481,12 @@ struct GTY((chain_next ("%h.next_caller"
      call expression.  */
   void redirect_callee (cgraph_node *n);
 
+  /* If the edge does not lead to a thunk, simply redirect it to N.  Otherwise
+     create one or more equivalent thunks for N and redirect E to the first in
+     the chain.  Note that it is then necessary to call
+     n->expand_all_artificial_thunks once all callers are redirected.  */
+  void redirect_callee_duplicating_thunks (cgraph_node *n);
+
   /* Make an indirect edge with an unknown callee an ordinary edge leading to
      CALLEE.  DELTA is an integer constant that is to be added to the this
      pointer (first parameter) to compensate for skipping
Index: src/gcc/cgraphclones.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gcc/cgraphclones.c
+++ src/gcc/cgraphclones.c
@@ -370,28 +370,47 @@ duplicate_thunk_for_node (cgraph_node *t
 						  CGRAPH_FREQ_BASE);
   e->call_stmt_cannot_inline_p = true;
   symtab->call_edge_duplication_hooks (thunk->callees, e);
-  if (new_thunk->expand_thunk (false, false))
-    {
-      new_thunk->thunk.thunk_p = false;
-      new_thunk->analyze ();
-    }
-
   symtab->call_cgraph_duplication_hooks (thunk, new_thunk);
   return new_thunk;
 }
 
 /* If E does not lead to a thunk, simply redirect it to N.  Otherwise create
    one or more equivalent thunks for N and redirect E to the first in the
-   chain.  */
+   chain.  Note that it is then necessary to call
+   n->expand_all_artificial_thunks once all callers are redirected.  */
 
 void
-redirect_edge_duplicating_thunks (cgraph_edge *e, cgraph_node *n)
+cgraph_edge::redirect_callee_duplicating_thunks (cgraph_node *n)
 {
-  cgraph_node *orig_to = e->callee->ultimate_alias_target ();
+  cgraph_node *orig_to = callee->ultimate_alias_target ();
   if (orig_to->thunk.thunk_p)
     n = duplicate_thunk_for_node (orig_to, n);
 
-  e->redirect_callee (n);
+  redirect_callee (n);
+}
+
+/* Call expand_thunk on all callers that are thunks and if analyze those nodes
+   that were expanded.  */
+
+void
+cgraph_node::expand_all_artificial_thunks ()
+{
+  cgraph_edge *e;
+  for (e = callers; e;)
+    if (e->caller->thunk.thunk_p)
+      {
+	cgraph_node *thunk = e->caller;
+
+	e = e->next_caller;
+	if (thunk->expand_thunk (false, false))
+	  {
+	    thunk->thunk.thunk_p = false;
+	    thunk->analyze ();
+	  }
+	thunk->expand_all_artificial_thunks ();
+      }
+    else
+      e = e->next_caller;
 }
 
 /* Create node representing clone of N executed COUNT times.  Decrease
@@ -483,8 +502,9 @@ cgraph_node::create_clone (tree decl, gc
       if (!e->callee
 	  || DECL_BUILT_IN_CLASS (e->callee->decl) != BUILT_IN_NORMAL
 	  || DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (e->callee->decl) != BUILT_IN_UNREACHABLE)
-        redirect_edge_duplicating_thunks (e, new_node);
+        e->redirect_callee_duplicating_thunks (new_node);
     }
+  new_node->expand_all_artificial_thunks ();
 
   for (e = callees;e; e=e->next_callee)
     e->clone (new_node, e->call_stmt, e->lto_stmt_uid, count_scale,
Index: src/gcc/ipa-cp.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gcc/ipa-cp.c
+++ src/gcc/ipa-cp.c
@@ -3806,7 +3806,8 @@ perhaps_add_new_callers (cgraph_node *no
 			 xstrdup (val->spec_node->name ()),
 			 val->spec_node->order);
 
-	      cs->redirect_callee (val->spec_node);
+	      cs->redirect_callee_duplicating_thunks (val->spec_node);
+	      val->spec_node->expand_all_artificial_thunks ();
 	      redirected_sum += cs->count;
 	    }
 	  cs = get_next_cgraph_edge_clone (cs);


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]