This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[C++ Patch] PR 55425


Hi,

today I wanted to simply close this Bug as fixed, but then I noticed that Richard Smith in the audit trail argued, correctly in my opinion, that we should accept things like:

constexpr const char* x() { return __func__; }

in C++11 mode too, because the "as if" local variable specification of __func__ in the Standard doesn't matter for the purpose of constexpr, because otherwise in C++11 no constexpr function would be valid: the Standard does *not* say that __func__ is only predefined if it is used.

That said, I think a quick way to accept __func__, __FUNCTION__, and __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is checking whether DECL_ARTIFICIAL (decl) is true on the decl. Tested x86_64-linux.

Thanks,
Paolo.

///////////////////

Attachment: CL_55425
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_55425
Description: Text document


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]