This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: New patch: [AArch64] [BE] [1/2] Make large opaque integer modes endianness-safe.


On 13 November 2014 15:32, David Sherwood <david.sherwood@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think that's because Alan Hayward's original patch had a bug in it, which he
> has fixed and should be submitting to gcc patches fairly soon. So it's probably
> best waiting until he gets a new patch up I think.
>

I've applied both Alan's patches and the advsimd-intrinsics tests now
all pass on aarch64_be, but this doesn't need your patch.

Which testcase does your patch actually fix?


> Regards,
> David.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christophe Lyon [mailto:christophe.lyon@linaro.org]
> Sent: 13 November 2014 14:22
> To: David Sherwood
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: New patch: [AArch64] [BE] [1/2] Make large opaque integer modes endianness-safe.
>
> On 13 November 2014 11:09, David Sherwood <david.sherwood@arm.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have successfully rebased this and tested in conjunction with a patch from
>> Alan Hayward ([AArch64] [BE] Fix vector load/stores to not use ld1/st1), who
>> should be submitting a new version shortly. Built and tested on:
>>
>> aarch64-none-elf
>> aarch64_be-none-elf
>> x86_64-linux-gnu
>
> I've applied both patches to recent trunk (r217483), and I still see
> ICEs on aarch64_be, when running the advsimd-intrinsics/vldX.c tests.
>
> I have them with Alan Hayward's patch alone, too. BTW, I thought that
> patch had been approved by Marcus, but it's not in trunk yet. Maybe I
> missed something.
>
> Christophe.
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> David Sherwood.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Sherwood [mailto:david.sherwood@arm.com]
>> Sent: 28 October 2014 08:55
>> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
>> Subject: RE: [AArch64] [BE] [1/2] Make large opaque integer modes endianness-safe.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry to bother you again. Could someone take a look at this change
>> please if they have time?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> David.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Sherwood [mailto:david.sherwood@arm.com]
>> Sent: 10 October 2014 15:48
>> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: [AArch64] [BE] [1/2] Make large opaque integer modes endianness-safe.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a fix (originally written by Tejas Belagod) for the following bug:
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59810
>>
>> Could someone take a look please?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> David Sherwood.
>>
>> ChangeLog:
>>
>>     gcc/:
>>     2014-11-13  David Sherwood  <david.sherwood@arm.com>
>>
>>         * config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (aarch64_simd_attr_length_rglist,
>>         aarch64_reverse_mask): New decls.
>>         * config/aarch64/iterators.md (UNSPEC_REV_REGLIST): New enum.
>>         * config/aarch64/iterators.md (insn_count): New mode_attr.
>>        * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (vec_store_lanes(o/c/x)i,
>>         vec_load_lanes(o/c/x)i): Fixed to work for Big Endian.
>>         * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (aarch64_rev_reglist,
>>         aarch64_simd_(ld/st)(2/3/4)): Added.
>>         * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_simd_attr_length_rglist,
>>         aarch64_reverse_mask): Added.
>
>
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]