This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [BUILDROBOT] Build breakage in builtin.c (was: [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker, Builtins instrumentation 3/5] Expand instrumented builtin calls)
- From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl dot de>
- To: Ilya Enkovich <enkovich dot gnu at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:43:31 +0100
- Subject: Re: [BUILDROBOT] Build breakage in builtin.c (was: [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker, Builtins instrumentation 3/5] Expand instrumented builtin calls)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20141106122459 dot GB44122 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com> <20141117145242 dot GW8445 at lug-owl dot de> <20141117145941 dot GD344 at x4> <20141117151219 dot GX8445 at lug-owl dot de> <20141117161734 dot GD5422 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com>
On Mon, 2014-11-17 19:17:34 +0300, Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 17 Nov 16:12, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-11-17 15:59:41 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de> wrote:
> > > On 2014.11.17 at 15:52 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2014-11-06 15:24:59 +0300, Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> i386 target mode is used instead of a hook. Here is a fix. Checked
> it fixes ARM cross build. Committed as obvious fix.
Thanks a lot! The first non-x86 build already succeeded:
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=376848
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481
Signature of: The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty
the second : decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker, Builtins instrumentation 3/5] Expand instrumented builtin calls
- [BUILDROBOT] Build breakage in builtin.c (was: [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker, Builtins instrumentation 3/5] Expand instrumented builtin calls)
- Re: [BUILDROBOT] Build breakage in builtin.c (was: [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker, Builtins instrumentation 3/5] Expand instrumented builtin calls)
- From: Markus Trippelsdorf
- Re: [BUILDROBOT] Build breakage in builtin.c (was: [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker, Builtins instrumentation 3/5] Expand instrumented builtin calls)
- Re: [BUILDROBOT] Build breakage in builtin.c (was: [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker, Builtins instrumentation 3/5] Expand instrumented builtin calls)