This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [AArch64] Fix predicate and constraint mismatch in logical atomic operations


On 25 September 2014 21:30, Segher Boessenkool
<segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:33:17AM -0700, Michael Collison wrote:
>> The problem is the "CONST_INT 0", not a large constant. This constant is
>> not accepted by the predicate, but is accepted by the constraint.
>
> Yes, bad choice of words, sorry.  Just read "big" as "not matching the
> predicate".  The point is that everything works fine until RA, and that
> makes it hard to make a useful test.
>

Hi,

IIUC, a testcase is not required/practicable.
So, may I ping this patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02209.html

Thanks,

Christophe.

>
> Segher
>
>
> p.s.  Please don't top-post.  Thanks.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]