Re: [C++ Patch/RFC] PR 53025

[Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>]

Hi,

On 10/02/2014 07:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 10/02/2014 12:44 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> > +  s->noexcept_operand = scope_chain ? cp_noexcept_operand : 0;
> >     s->x_stmt_tree.stmts_are_full_exprs_p = true;
> >
> >     scope_chain = s;
> > @@ -6182,6 +6183,7 @@ pop_from_top_level_1 (void)
> >     current_function_decl = s->function_decl;
> >     cp_unevaluated_operand = s->unevaluated_operand;
> >     c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings = s->inhibit_evaluation_warnings;
> > +  cp_noexcept_operand = s->noexcept_operand;
>
> The benefit of putting it in scope_chain directly is that you don't 
> need to change anything here.  OK without these changes.
Oh, nice. Then I'm going to apply the below and resolve the bug.

Thanks,
Paolo.

///////////////////

Attachment: CL_53025
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_53025_4
Description: Text document