This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] PR63300 'const volatile' sometimes stripped in debug info.
- From: Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com>
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andreas Arnez <arnez at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:22:58 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR63300 'const volatile' sometimes stripped in debug info.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1411249535-2193-1-git-send-email-mjw at redhat dot com> <87oau8kp39 dot fsf at br87z6lw dot de dot ibm dot com> <87k34uleew dot fsf at br87z6lw dot de dot ibm dot com> <5421E22C dot 8060904 at redhat dot com> <20140923225311 dot GB16563 at blokker dot redhat dot com> <5422D96A dot 8040601 at redhat dot com> <1411578329 dot 5074 dot 9 dot camel at bordewijk dot wildebeest dot org> <54230944 dot 3080206 at redhat dot com> <1411584147 dot 5074 dot 11 dot camel at bordewijk dot wildebeest dot org> <542332EC dot 1050003 at redhat dot com>
On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 17:09 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 09/24/2014 02:42 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > As my example shows even with older GCCs depending on whether a const
> > type or volatile type was encountered first a const volatile type comes
> > out either as a DIE chain const_type DIE -> volatile_type DIE -> type
> > DIE, or the other way around, in different compile units.
>
> Sorry, I overlooked that you were talking about 4.8.3 in your earlier mail.
>
> The patch is OK.
Thanks.
I did post to the DWARF mailinglist to ask for clarification of the
issue of ordering of type qualifier modifiers vs type unit signatures:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.standards.dwarf/202
Cheers,
Mark