This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] microblaze: microblaze.md: Use 'SI' instead of 'VOID' for operand 1 of 'call_value_intern'
- From: Chen Gang <gang dot chen dot 5i5j at gmail dot com>
- To: Michael Eager <eager at eagerm dot com>
- Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, davem at redhat dot com, gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:18:28 +0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] microblaze: microblaze.md: Use 'SI' instead of 'VOID' for operand 1 of 'call_value_intern'
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <53B9246A dot 5090408 at gmail dot com> <53EB7FE3 dot 40406 at eagerm dot com> <53EC1264 dot 2080205 at gmail dot com> <540C7703 dot 7090303 at gmail dot com> <540D1363 dot 10909 at gmail dot com> <540DCB1B dot 40901 at gmail dot com> <54154907 dot 2000007 at gmail dot com> <541656FE dot 8020008 at eagerm dot com> <541668CF dot 5080206 at gmail dot com> <54170603 dot 8090607 at eagerm dot com> <54176DCF dot 403 at gmail dot com> <54182E13 dot 1090006 at eagerm dot com> <541DA2A0 dot 5040200 at gmail dot com> <541DABEC dot 7090705 at eagerm dot com> <541DAE2B dot 8050104 at gmail dot com> <541E6F2F dot 7080101 at gmail dot com> <541E8A04 dot 7060208 at gmail dot com> <541EAC71 dot 2090403 at gmail dot com> <541F1459 dot 8090003 at eagerm dot com> <541FA13E dot 2040003 at gmail dot com> <542035EC dot 6000106 at eagerm dot com> <5420469C dot 2030600 at gmail dot com> <54205777 dot 8030506 at eagerm dot com> <5420D55E dot 90605 at gmail dot com> <54219F49 dot 3090508 at gmail dot com> <54221C79 dot 5090206 at gmail dot com> <5422D5D0 dot 4070604 at gmail dot com> <5422E30C dot 2040508 at eagerm dot com>
On 09/24/2014 11:28 PM, Michael Eager wrote:
> On 09/24/14 07:31, Chen Gang wrote:
>> Hello Michael:
>>
>> Firstly, thank you very much for always providing your aid to me for
>> microblaze.
>>
>> At present, after try testsuite, the result is much better than my
>> original trying, please help check the result: "is it enough for our
>> microblaze testsuite" (can we say it pass checking)?
>>
>> Current result:
>>
>> # of expected passes 65987
>> # of unexpected failures 82
>> # of unexpected successes 1
>> # of expected failures 97
>> # of unresolved testcases 16378
>> # of unsupported tests 1810
>
> This is good.
>
OK, thanks, and I shall send a fix patch for "((void (*)(void))0)()"
tomorrow, it pass testsuite (old and new get the same result), but new
can fix "((void (*)(void))0)()" issue. So I guess this fix is valid. :-)
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
Open share and attitude like air water and life which God blessed