This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: parallel check output changes?
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel dot crashing dot org>
- To: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Bernd Schmidt <bernds at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, richard dot sandiford at arm dot com
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 11:10:39 -0500
- Subject: Re: parallel check output changes?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <541AD692 dot 4030907 at redhat dot com> <20140918130109 dot GH17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <541AD880 dot 7080703 at redhat dot com> <541AF451 dot 3070406 at redhat dot com> <541B1710 dot 8060809 at codesourcery dot com> <20140918173609 dot GM17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <20140918184455 dot GB28595 at gate dot crashing dot org> <20140919093723 dot GA26414 at gate dot crashing dot org> <87iokel5c0 dot fsf at e105548-lin dot cambridge dot arm dot com> <5422DB41 dot 1090800 at redhat dot com>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 09/23/2014 11:33 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >Your patch instead sorts based on the full test name, including options,
> >which means that the output no longer matches what you'd get from a
> >non-parallel run. AFAICT, it also no longer matches what you'd get from
> >the .sh version. That might be OK, just thought I'd mention it.
With the parallellisation changes the output was pretty random order. My
patch made that a fixed order again, albeit a different one from before.
> Is this suppose to be resolved now? I'm still seeing some issues with a
> branch cut from mainline from yesterday. This is from the following
> sequence:
>
> check out revision 215511 , build, make -j16 check, make -j16 check,
> then compare all the .sum files:
I don't understand what exactly you did; you have left out some steps
I think?
Segher