This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Fix PR63266: Keep track of impact of sign extension in bswap


Hi all,

The fix for PR61306 disabled bswap when a sign extension is detected. However this led to a test case regression (and potential performance regression) in case where a sign extension happens but its effect is canceled by other bit manipulation. This patch aims to fix that by having a special marker to track bytes whose value is unpredictable due to sign extension. If the final result of a bit manipulation doesn't contain any such marker then the bswap optimization can proceed.

*** gcc/ChangeLog ***

2014-09-15  Thomas Preud'homme  <thomas.preudhomme@arm.com>

	PR tree-optimization/63266
	* tree-ssa-math-opts.c (struct symbolic_number): Add comment about
	marker for unknown byte value.
	(MARKER_MASK): New macro.
	(MARKER_BYTE_UNKNOWN): New macro.
	(HEAD_MARKER): New macro.
	(do_shift_rotate): Mark bytes with unknown values due to sign
	extension when doing an arithmetic right shift. Replace hardcoded
	mask for marker by new MARKER_MASK macro.
	(find_bswap_or_nop_1): Likewise and adjust ORing of two symbolic
	numbers accordingly.

*** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog ***

2014-09-15  Thomas Preud'homme  <thomas.preudhomme@arm.com>

	PR tree-optimization/63266
	* gcc.dg/optimize-bswapsi-1.c (swap32_d): New bswap pass test.


Testing:

* Built an arm-none-eabi-gcc cross-compiler and used it to run the testsuite on QEMU emulating Cortex-M3 without any regression
* Bootstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu target and testsuite was run without regression


Ok for trunk?

Attachment: pr63266.1.1.diff
Description: Binary data


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]