This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ptx preliminary address space fixes [3/4]

From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:51:53 +0200
Subject: Re: ptx preliminary address space fixes [3/4]
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <54117586 dot 8050503 at codesourcery dot com> <CAFiYyc2XJSfDtysNzQ9sjpE3pdqS5YCJnktf3TPUCxHa2SVgBQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <5412D45A dot 5080705 at codesourcery dot com> <CAFiYyc0rsSfhuq1xcK=D+n2x7weBhiFTRbZSgW73zZ5xErb-jA at mail dot gmail dot com>

On 09/12/2014 01:45 PM, Richard Biener wrote:

Let me know what you prefer.


Hmm, neither I suppose.  COMPLEX_TYPEs are also built
with main-variant component type and I suspect the same for
ARRAY_TYPEs.  I see the address-space on types as
artifact that comes from Frontend support (aka parsing).

Fixing up the vector type in advance is ok with me but I'd like us to
move away from address-space-on-types.

Is that an approval for the first variant in the sense that it's thebest we can do at the moment? Or are you requiring a rewrite of all theaddress space support in the compiler?



Bernd

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ptx preliminary address space fixes [3/4]
  - From: Richard Biener

References:
- ptx preliminary address space fixes [3/4]
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: ptx preliminary address space fixes [3/4]
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: ptx preliminary address space fixes [3/4]
  - From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: ptx preliminary address space fixes [3/4]
  - From: Richard Biener

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]