This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check
- From: Yury Gribov <y dot gribov at samsung dot com>
- To: VandeVondele Joost <joost dot vandevondele at mat dot ethz dot ch>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:27:10 +0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F4103 at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <20140905143740 dot GL17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F414C at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <20140905145304 dot GM17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F7F45 at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <540ED02A dot 9080002 at samsung dot com> <20140909101043 dot GQ17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F8014 at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch> <20140909132414 dot GT17454 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD93150F80BA at MBX23 dot d dot ethz dot ch>
On 09/09/2014 06:14 PM, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
I certainly don't want to claim that the patch I have now is perfect,
it is rather an incremental improvement on the current setup.
I'd second this. Writing patterns manually seems rather inefficient and
error-prone
(not undoable of course but unnecessarily complicated). And with current
(crippled)
version Joost already got 100% test time improvement.
-Y