This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Patch for switch elimination (PR 54742)

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Sebastian Pop <sebpop at gmail dot com>, Steve Ellcey <sellcey at mips dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, james dot greenhalgh at arm dot com, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:56:03 -0600
Subject: Re: RFC: Patch for switch elimination (PR 54742)
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <1407865606 dot 2601 dot 74 dot camel at ubuntu-sellcey> <53EA5D74 dot 9020809 at redhat dot com> <47b32a49-298e-44f0-b84b-b8f664847a67 at email dot android dot com> <53EA7BD0 dot 1030901 at redhat dot com> <1407883486 dot 2601 dot 86 dot camel at ubuntu-sellcey> <20140813205519 dot GB23343 at instance-1 dot c dot bardezibar dot internal> <53EBD365 dot 4040100 at redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc2UKX74WKeE5e2tyKqmRbW5K4j4KbG0Fwgb+8iMYMTCiA at mail dot gmail dot com>

On 08/14/14 04:32, Richard Biener wrote:

You'll note in a separate thread Steve and I discussed this during Cauldron
and it was at my recommendation Steve resurrected his proof of concept
plugin and started beating it into shape.


But do we really want a pass just to help coremark?

And that's the biggest argument against Steve's work. In theory itshould be applicable to other FSMs, but nobody's come forth withadditional testcases from real world applications.


jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Patch for switch elimination (PR 54742)
  - From: David Malcolm

References:
- RFC: Patch for switch elimination (PR 54742)
  - From: Steve Ellcey
- Re: RFC: Patch for switch elimination (PR 54742)
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: RFC: Patch for switch elimination (PR 54742)
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: RFC: Patch for switch elimination (PR 54742)
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: RFC: Patch for switch elimination (PR 54742)
  - From: Steve Ellcey
- Re: RFC: Patch for switch elimination (PR 54742)
  - From: Sebastian Pop
- Re: RFC: Patch for switch elimination (PR 54742)
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: RFC: Patch for switch elimination (PR 54742)
  - From: Richard Biener

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]