This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR tree-optimization/52904 testcase
- From: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Kugan <kugan dot vivekanandarajah at linaro dot org>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:30:35 +0200
- Subject: Re: PR tree-optimization/52904 testcase
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <53E6151A dot 203 at linaro dot org> <CAFiYyc3wRrigBAhbnGu4OaGJmnULda0cPAh1QWu7wdJcH2WzdQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <53E98117 dot 9090904 at linaro dot org>
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Kugan
<kugan.vivekanandarajah@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/08/14 18:03, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Kugan <kugan.vivekanandarajah@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52904
>>>
>>> Tescase was generating warning: assuming signed overflow does not occur
>>> when simplifying conditional to constant [-Wstrict-overflow] due to VRP
>>> missing the value range.
>>>
>>> This seems to have been fixed and the PR is now closed. However, as
>>> requested there in the PR, I am sending this patch to add the test-case
>>> to test-suite.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is this OK ?
>>
>> Did you verify the testcase fails before the revision that fixed it?
>> Esp. the placement of the dg-bogus looks bogus to me.
>
> I tried it on Linaro 4.9 (It should be the same in fsf gcc 4.9 branch)
> and the test cases is failing there. Passes on trunk.
Well, it probably fails because of excess errors, not because of
the dg-bogus failing. The dg-bogus has to be on the line that
the warning triggers on.
> In any case, I have moved it to the top and reverified. I have also
> trimmed the warning pattern to check as there was some changes there
> from 4.9 to trunk.
>
>>
>> Also don't use -S in dg-options, use lower-case filenames and
>> avoid spurious vertical white-space. The VRP dump scan is
>> also very unspecific - I suggest to drop it entirely.
>>
>
> Done.
>
>
> Is this OK?
Err.
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+
Excessive vertical space
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wstrict-overflow -O2" } */
+/* { dg-bogus "assuming signed overflow does not occur when simplifying" */
+
Missing closing }
Thanks,
Richard.
>
> Thanks,
> Kugan
>
> gcc/testsuite
> 2014-08-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kuganv@linaro.org>
>
> PR tree-optimization/52904
> * gcc.dg/pr52904.c: New test.
>
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Richard.
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kugan
>>>
>>> gcc/testsuite
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-08-09 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kuganv@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> PR tree-optimization/52904
>>> * gcc.dg/PR52904.c: New test.