This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Patch for constexpr variable templates

On 07/30/2014 05:33 PM, Braden Obrzut wrote:

On 07/30/2014 04:44 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:

Why not do this in cp_parser_id_expression?



I did mention this in the original mail, is this definitely the way it
should be done?
In the original mail you mentioned doing it in cp_parser_template_id; I agree that we probably don't want to do it there because of the complications you are seeing. I was thinking about doing it when we normally resolve an id-expression that refers to a variable, once we know we're looking at an expression and not a declarator-id. But I think my suggestion of cp_parser_id_expression was wrong, and it would be better in finish_id_expression. 

Jason
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]