This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 07/27/2014 10:06 PM, Braden Obrzut wrote:
So given this, should I leave the test cases that fail for this reason alone or should I still change them to dg-message? It sounds like GCC's behavior with auto in function parameters needs to be changed, but that definitely sounds like a separate patch to me.
I think let's leave them as dg-error, remove the expected error text, and mark them as xfail, i.e.
// { dg-error "" "" { xfail *-*-* } }Then a patch to treat these as variables with deduced type can fill in the appropriate error text.
Jason
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |