This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Make declaration of wide_int_storage match its definition


On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 09:25:50PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, pinskia@gmail.com wrote:
> > This patch is fine but c++ allows class and struct be used 
> > interchangeable. If there is a compilers which does not it is broken 
> > and should be report to them.  Yes that means clang is broken.
> 
> Clang does allow for it (it actually is the stage 1 compiler on 
> FreeBSD 10, the platform I used for my tests); it just warns about 
> it.  About 400 times.

That doesn't change anything that the warning is very much broken.
In C++ struct is simply a class with default public:, class with a default
private:, when you are just forward declaring it, whether it defaults to
public: or private: doesn't matter at all, therefore the warning just
enforces some weirdo clang coding style.

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]