This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] Update libstdc++ FAQ and ensure stable anchors in HTML docs
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 22:40:26 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [patch] Update libstdc++ FAQ and ensure stable anchors in HTML docs
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140609144716 dot GG30729 at redhat dot com>
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This fairly tedious patch refreshes the FAQ, including adding some
notes saying "This answer is old and probably no longer relevant" to
several answers referring to problems in the GCC 3.x era.
I'm wondering, should those old items be removed? GCC 3.x is
really a looong while ago (and I did check some of those items).
A FAQ that containts many NAFAQs (not actually frequently asked
questions) may actually be less useful and paint a more negative
picture.
Gerald