This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, On 06/15/2014 03:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I think the below would be most of it. Today, however, I did some archeology, noticed that we would essentially revert to pre-PR9278 behavior (thus, per its audit trail, make again unhappy some people in the template metaprogramming world?!? Was that known to Core when DR577 got resolved?) and that, fwiw, neither current clang nor current ICC appear to implement DR577 in full. Please double check those sides of the issue... personally I don't have a strong opinion...On 06/15/2014 01:01 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:Committed... but, I don't think we are done yet, because it seems to me that DR577 means that in C++11 mode we have to accept the typedef?!?Hmm, apparently so. Might as well apply the DR to C++98 mode as well.
Thanks! Paolo. ///////////////////
Attachment:
CL_dr577
Description: Text document
Attachment:
patch_dr577
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |