This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 06/13/2014 02:45 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
Yeah, my point was just that unscoped enums (with an explicit underlying type) as such are eligible for specialization
Yes, but if there is a template definition for the enum available when the specialization is declared, the enum template is implicitly instantiated along with its containing class, so the specialization is ill-formed because you can't define a specialization that has already been instantiated. Which is what the example in the standard illustrates.
Jason
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |