This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker 14/x] Pointer Bounds Checker passes
- From: Ilya Enkovich <enkovich dot gnu at gmail dot com>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 19:13:52 +0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker 14/x] Pointer Bounds Checker passes
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140529111140 dot GC30323 at msticlxl57 dot ims dot intel dot com> <CAFiYyc0jCmehLi5pKtb002QH4Ps63hWA4i369s7GVTrXYr_7Fg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAMbmDYZ98sqT7yk=YK2dpnsL8KxYSyg3uSnY8h=k8O8eBFgLaQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAFiYyc3GiNtsB86P2PZkY=aAnvwD2oUWukck0t5FQr_vNsYktw at mail dot gmail dot com>
2014-06-02 17:37 GMT+04:00 Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2014-06-02 15:35 GMT+04:00 Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>:
>>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds Pointer Bounds Checker passes. Versioning happens before early local passes. Earply local passes are split into 3 stages to have everything instrumented before any optimization applies.
>>>
>>> That looks artificial to me. If you need to split up early_local_passes
>>> then do that - nesting three IPA pass groups inside it looks odd to me.
>>> Btw - doing this in three "IPA phases" makes things possibly slower
>>> due to cache effects. It might be worth pursuing to move the early
>>> stage completely to the lowering pipeline.
>>
>> Early local passes is some special case because these passes are
>> executed separately for new functions. I did not want to get three
>> special passes instead and therefore made split inside.
>
> Yeah, but all passes are already executed via execute_early_local_passes,
> so it would be only an implementation detail.
>
>> If you prefer split pass itself, I suppose pass_early_local_passes may
>> be replaced with something like pass_build_ssa_passes +
>> pass_chkp_instrumentation_passes + pass_ipa_chkp_produce_thunks +
>> pass_local_optimization_passes. execute_early_local_passes would
>> execute gimple passes lists of pass_build_ssa_passes,
>> pass_chkp_instrumentation_passes and pass_local_optimization_passes.
>>
>> I think we cannot have the first stage moved into lowering passes
>> because it should be executed for newly created functions.
>
> Well, let's defer that then.
>
>>>
>>> Btw, fixup_cfg only needs to run once local_pure_const was run
>>> on a callee, thus it shouldn't be neccessary to run it from the
>>> first group.
>>
>> OK. Will try to remove it from the first group.
>>
>>>
>>> void
>>> pass_manager::execute_early_local_passes ()
>>> {
>>> - execute_pass_list (pass_early_local_passes_1->sub);
>>> + execute_pass_list (pass_early_local_passes_1->sub->sub);
>>> + execute_pass_list (pass_early_local_passes_1->sub->next->sub);
>>> + execute_pass_list (pass_early_local_passes_1->sub->next->next->next->sub);
>>> }
>>>
>>> is gross - it should be enough to execute the early local pass list
>>> (obsolete comment with the suggestion above).
>>
>> This function should call only gimple passes for cfun. Therefore we
>> cannot call IPA passes here and has to execute each gimple passes list
>> separately.
>
> Ok, given a different split this would then become somewhat more sane
> anyway.
Sorry, didn't catch it. Should I try a different split or defer it? :)
Ilya
>
> Richard.
>
>> Ilya
>>>
>>> Richard.
>>>
>>>> Bootstrapped and tested on linux-x86_64.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ilya
>>>> --
>>>> gcc/
>>>>
>>>> 2014-05-29 Ilya Enkovich <ilya.enkovich@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> * tree-chkp.c: New.
>>>> * tree-chkp.h: New.
>>>> * rtl-chkp.c: New.
>>>> * rtl-chkp.h: New.
>>>> * Makefile.in (OBJS): Add tree-chkp.o, rtl-chkp.o.
>>>> (GTFILES): Add tree-chkp.c.
>>>> * c-family/c.opt (fchkp-check-incomplete-type): New.
>>>> (fchkp-zero-input-bounds-for-main): New.
>>>> (fchkp-first-field-has-own-bounds): New.
>>>> (fchkp-narrow-bounds): New.
>>>> (fchkp-narrow-to-innermost-array): New.
>>>> (fchkp-optimize): New.
>>>> (fchkp-use-fast-string-functions): New.
>>>> (fchkp-use-nochk-string-functions): New.
>>>> (fchkp-use-static-bounds): New.
>>>> (fchkp-use-static-const-bounds): New.
>>>> (fchkp-treat-zero-dynamic-size-as-infinite): New.
>>>> (fchkp-check-read): New.
>>>> (fchkp-check-write): New.
>>>> (fchkp-store-bounds): New.
>>>> (fchkp-instrument-calls): New.
>>>> (fchkp-instrument-marked-only): New.
>>>> * cppbuiltin.c (define_builtin_macros_for_compilation_flags): Add
>>>> __CHKP__ macro when Pointer Bounds Checker is on.
>>>> * passes.def (pass_ipa_chkp_versioning): New.
>>>> (pass_before_local_optimization_passes): New.
>>>> (pass_chkp_instrumentation_passes): New.
>>>> (pass_ipa_chkp_produce_thunks): New.
>>>> (pass_local_optimization_passes): New.
>>>> (pass_chkp_opt): New.
>>>> * toplev.c: include tree-chkp.h.
>>>> (compile_file): Add chkp_finish_file call.
>>>> * tree-pass.h (make_pass_ipa_chkp_versioning): New.
>>>> (make_pass_ipa_chkp_produce_thunks): New.
>>>> (make_pass_chkp): New.
>>>> (make_pass_chkp_opt): New.
>>>> (make_pass_before_local_optimization_passes): New.
>>>> (make_pass_chkp_instrumentation_passes): New.
>>>> (make_pass_local_optimization_passes): New.
>>>> * tree.h (called_as_built_in): New.
>>>> * builtins.c (called_as_built_in): Not static anymore.
>>>> * passes.c (pass_manager::execute_early_local_passes): Execute
>>>> early passes in three steps.
>>>> (pass_data_before_local_optimization_passes): New.
>>>> (pass_before_local_optimization_passes): New.
>>>> (pass_data_chkp_instrumentation_passes): New.
>>>> (pass_chkp_instrumentation_passes): New.
>>>> (pass_data_local_optimization_passes): New.
>>>> (pass_local_optimization_passes): New.
>>>> (make_pass_before_local_optimization_passes): New.
>>>> (make_pass_chkp_instrumentation_passes): New.
>>>> (make_pass_local_optimization_passes): New.