This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Contributing new gcc targets: i386-*-dragonfly and x86-64-*-dragonfly
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: John Marino <gnugcc at marino dot st>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <manu at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Eric Botcazou (gnu.org)" <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 15:10:15 +0100
- Subject: Re: Contributing new gcc targets: i386-*-dragonfly and x86-64-*-dragonfly
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5352D100 dot 9040108 at marino dot st> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1405012259450 dot 16441 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <5362DC9B dot 8090709 at marino dot st> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1405021746390 dot 4946 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <5363E0F4 dot 4060900 at marino dot st> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1405022013520 dot 7129 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <53649694 dot 6050508 at marino dot st> <536C671F dot 4080100 at redhat dot com> <536C8059 dot 8090304 at marino dot st> <5370FDD9 dot 8030802 at redhat dot com> <53710071 dot 9040901 at marino dot st> <53710158 dot 10305 at redhat dot com>
On 12 May 2014 18:14, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/12/14 11:10, John Marino wrote:
>>
>> On 5/12/2014 18:59, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/09/14 01:14, John Marino wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1) Patch updated online as requested
>>>> 2) At this exact point in time, we probably can share the files
>>>> 3) I might debate that we should share the files - that would imply
>>>> reviewing the existing counterpart files for NetBSD and OpenBSD and
>>>> combining when equivalent.
>>>
>>> Let's go ahead and keep the files separate. We can always go back and
>>> combine them at a later date if we see the need.
>>>
>>> So with that in mind, the patch is good to go with the gnat thread stuff
>>> removed.
>>>
>>> Do you have write access, or do you you need someone to commit the
>>> change for you?
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Jeff!
>> I do not have write access, but jwakely has graciously offered to commit
>> this patchset when it achieves approval, so I guess he's on deck!
>
> OK. It's Jon's :-)
Great, I'll coordinate with John and aim to get it committed before Friday.