This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Contributing new gcc targets: i386-*-dragonfly and x86-64-*-dragonfly
- From: John Marino <gnugcc at marino dot st>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Eric Botcazou (gnu.org)" <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:10:09 +0200
- Subject: Re: Contributing new gcc targets: i386-*-dragonfly and x86-64-*-dragonfly
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5352D100 dot 9040108 at marino dot st> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1405012259450 dot 16441 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <5362DC9B dot 8090709 at marino dot st> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1405021746390 dot 4946 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <5363E0F4 dot 4060900 at marino dot st> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1405022013520 dot 7129 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <53649694 dot 6050508 at marino dot st> <536C671F dot 4080100 at redhat dot com> <536C8059 dot 8090304 at marino dot st> <5370FDD9 dot 8030802 at redhat dot com>
On 5/12/2014 18:59, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/09/14 01:14, John Marino wrote:
>>
>> 1) Patch updated online as requested
>> 2) At this exact point in time, we probably can share the files
>> 3) I might debate that we should share the files - that would imply
>> reviewing the existing counterpart files for NetBSD and OpenBSD and
>> combining when equivalent.
> Let's go ahead and keep the files separate. We can always go back and
> combine them at a later date if we see the need.
>
> So with that in mind, the patch is good to go with the gnat thread stuff
> removed.
>
> Do you have write access, or do you you need someone to commit the
> change for you?
Thanks, Jeff!
I do not have write access, but jwakely has graciously offered to commit
this patchset when it achieves approval, so I guess he's on deck!
John