This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH, nds32] Committed: Enable HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER when optimizing for size.


Hi, all,

There was a patch to have HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER using C expression:
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg01546.html
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00048.html

This is very helpful to nds32 port since we can decide when to apply
HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER against code size and performance trade-off.
Currently, HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER only benefits code size in nds32 port.

ChangeLog and patch are as below, committed as Rev.210137:


Index: gcc/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- gcc/ChangeLog       (revision 210135)
+++ gcc/ChangeLog       (revision 210137)
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2014-05-07  Chung-Ju Wu  <jasonwucj@gmail.com>
+
+       * config/nds32/nds32.h (HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER): Have it in favor
+       of using optimize_size.
+
 2014-05-06  Mike Stump  <mikestump@comcast.net>

        * wide-int.h (wi::int_traits <HOST_WIDE_INT>): Always define.

Index: gcc/config/nds32/nds32.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/nds32/nds32.h    (revision 210135)
+++ gcc/config/nds32/nds32.h    (revision 210137)
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@

 /* Tell IRA to use the order we define rather than messing it up with its
    own cost calculations.  */
-#define HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER 1
+#define HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER optimize_size

 /* The number of consecutive hard regs needed starting at
    reg "regno" for holding a value of mode "mode".  */


Best regards,
jasonwucj


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]