This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [DOC PATCH] Rewrite docs for inline asm
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, dw <limegreensocks at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: James Greenhalgh <james dot greenhalgh at arm dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>, Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford at googlemail dot com>, Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 08:58:27 +0100
- Subject: Re: [DOC PATCH] Rewrite docs for inline asm
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <533F0C97 dot 2010206 at yahoo dot com> <alpine dot BSF dot 2 dot 02 dot 1404081759100 dot 23831 at arjuna dot pair dot com> <5344DAC3 dot 90005 at yahoo dot com> <alpine dot BSF dot 2 dot 02 dot 1404122053010 dot 48644 at arjuna dot pair dot com> <534A5BFD dot 3000906 at yahoo dot com> <alpine dot BSF dot 2 dot 02 dot 1404132037070 dot 39694 at arjuna dot pair dot com> <534B7F38 dot 9010605 at yahoo dot com> <20140425154343 dot GA30738 at arm dot com> <alpine dot LSU dot 2 dot 11 dot 1404251938320 dot 2591 at tuna dot site> <535D8CC3 dot 2000100 at yahoo dot com> <alpine dot LSU dot 2 dot 11 dot 1405031538450 dot 2827 at tuna dot site>
On 05/05/2014 09:23 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Understood. Let's see that we can get an update committed soon.
> We can always improve on it further later on, which then will be
> a lot easier to do, review, and get pushed.
Yes. We already know that this is better than the current docs.
Let's check it in.
Andrew.