This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, ARM] Fix PR60609 (Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes)


This doesn't seem to have shown problems on trunk/4.9.

I have bootstrapped and checked the patch on 4.8
arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf (Thumb-2) on qemu.

I have checked the patch on 4.7 arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf (Thumb-2) on qemu.

OK to backport to 4.8 and 4.7?

On 7 April 2014 16:02, Charles Baylis <charles.baylis@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 4 April 2014 15:50, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.gcc@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Additionally the testing has only considered Thumb2 - since we also do
>> jumptable shortening for Thumb1 and given this late change it's worth
>> also testing this on Thumb1 and making sure there are no regressions.
>> Maybe Joey can help there if you aren't set up to do this.
>>
>> Ok if no regressions and modulo RM objections.
>
> I have tested v5t Thumb-1 with no regressions on qemu.
>
>> One minor Changelog nit.
>>
>> 2014-04-02  Charles Baylis  <charles.baylis@linaro.org>
>>
>>         PR target/60609
>>         * config/arm/arm.h (ASM_OUTPUT_CASE_END) Remove.
>>         (LABEL_ALIGN_AFTER_BARRIER) Align barriers which occur after
>>         ADDR_DIFF_VEC.
>>
>> s/)/):/g above.
>
> Noted.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]