This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch testsuite]: g++.dg/abi
- From: Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>
- To: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- Cc: Rainer Orth <ro at cebitec dot uni-bielefeld dot de>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:59:28 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch testsuite]: g++.dg/abi
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAEwic4Zbg0uoN5yDag3Xn3i44isNw7EJEtKV0hTKxkNhFeSgPA at mail dot gmail dot com> <72DBDA1C-AEB8-4962-843E-231CBF6717CE at comcast dot net> <CAEwic4YxEGZ-Jh0cYtzR0fsDhBD8_d_NXPmnEkG5eZGWj71dRQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <yddioram8vi dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <1D3F6F47-74A6-4869-B75C-4091ECA6EC69 at comcast dot net>
2014-03-19 17:54 GMT+01:00 Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>:
> On Mar 19, 2014, at 9:49 AM, Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> wrote:
>>> The concept of weak - as present in ELF - isn't known in COFF in
>>> general. There is some weak, but it works only for static library and
>>> in a limitted way. Therefore we can't (and don't) use it for COFF
>>> targets.
>>
>> In that case, it seems far better to have
>> gcc/testsuite/lib/target-support.exp (check_weak_available) reflect that
>> instead of lying about weak support.
>
> Yeah, this is the direction I was headed... :-)
Ok, I will sent a patch for changing target-support.exp.
And yes, target supports a kind of weak, but not the expected gnu-weak.
Thanks,
Kai