This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[C++ Patch] PR 58609


Hi,

in this regression we ICE during error recovery, much, much later, in the middle-end. In order to avoid that it seems to me that we can safely return NULL_TREE.

I'm also taking the occasion to change a pair of errors to error + inform (this is also consistent with eg, the explain-once type messages we have got in do_friend and in resolve_address_of_overloaded_function)

Tested x86_64-linux.

Thanks,
Paolo.

////////////////////

Attachment: CL_58609
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_58609
Description: Text document


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]